Sample report
What a nominating committee actually receives.
An illustrative Boardiqo report for an aspiring director. Every figure on this page is fictional and shown only to demonstrate the report grammar.
Reference samples, as issued
Two complete reports built by the reporting engine and released after human review. Each carries the verification code printed on the document; anyone can check it.
Director effectiveness · DE-1.0
English and French
Verification code
4F62-D645-8A
Check this codeDocuments
Readiness verdict
Appointable to an audit or risk committee of a mid-cap listed board, conditional on closing two documented evidence gaps. Strategic judgment and independence are the strongest demonstrated areas; behavioral governance is the binding constraint.
Competency profile against evidence ceiling
Competency profile against evidence ceiling
- C1Strategic Judgment4.35 / cap 5.00
- C2Financial Acumen4.10 / cap 4.50
- C3Risk Oversight3.90 / cap 4.00
- C5Regulatory Awareness3.55 / cap 4.00
- C8Crisis Management3.20 / cap 3.25
- C9Behavioral Governance2.60 / cap 3.25
- C10Independence4.05 / cap 4.50
- C11Boardroom Contribution3.70 / cap 4.00
Solid navy is earned score. The brass ring is the ceiling permitted by the graded evidence for that competency.
Constrained by evidence, not by judgment
Constrained by evidence, not by judgment
Hatched is response quality, solid is what the evidence allows to count. The difference is recoverable by supplying proof.
Three competencies, in full
Dated development plan
Dated development plan
| Competency | Action | day start | day end | cap before | cap after |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C9 Behavioral Governance | Document two dissent episodes with outcomes | 0 | 45 | 2.75 | 4.00 |
| C8 Crisis Management | Obtain crisis simulation attestation | 30 | 90 | 3.25 | 4.50 |
| C3 Risk Oversight | Add risk committee minutes extract | 60 | 150 | 4.00 | 5.00 |
Each action names the evidence that lifts the ceiling, with a target date range.
Human review
Human review
This report would not be released until a human reviewer cleared the flagged competency. Reviewer edits are versioned and the original AI draft is retained.